Some time back in a seminar, I heard a very concerned
botanist and ayurveda expert talking about how most of the research in Ayurveda
is going in the wrong direction. He said that currently most of it is aimed at
discovering the active ingredients in various plants, extracting that
ingredient and using it for the benefit of people. He simultaneously pointed
out that most of the molecules used as ‘active ingredients’ in various
medicines have proved to have relatively short useful life of few decades.
Either the germs become resistant to this purified form of chemical or its
effectiveness in humans start to drop over time. Compare this with herbs (crude
mixture of several compounds) which have served mankind over several centuries
without going out of fashion.
Ayurveda normally defines properties of herbal medicine as its ras (taste), gun (attributes), virya (potency), vipak (attributes of drug assimilation), and prabhav (dominating influence). For decades we have not added any herbs to Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia as we do not know how to identify these 5 properties of any new herb. His view was that new research should be aimed at solving this problem.
I heard another very senior and respected physician talking about how we try to simplify (over simplify) the traditional medical knowledge and try to put it in neatly drawn boxes. Think of coca leaves (from which cocaine is extracted) which are traditionally used in Latin America for both diarrhea as well as constipation. It might sound totally counter intuitive but it is true. Several herbs when used in their original form actually act as balancing herbs. So different ingredients become active based on the body’s condition. Nature surely is much more intelligent that most of us believe it to be.
Ayurveda normally defines properties of herbal medicine as its ras (taste), gun (attributes), virya (potency), vipak (attributes of drug assimilation), and prabhav (dominating influence). For decades we have not added any herbs to Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia as we do not know how to identify these 5 properties of any new herb. His view was that new research should be aimed at solving this problem.
I heard another very senior and respected physician talking about how we try to simplify (over simplify) the traditional medical knowledge and try to put it in neatly drawn boxes. Think of coca leaves (from which cocaine is extracted) which are traditionally used in Latin America for both diarrhea as well as constipation. It might sound totally counter intuitive but it is true. Several herbs when used in their original form actually act as balancing herbs. So different ingredients become active based on the body’s condition. Nature surely is much more intelligent that most of us believe it to be.
I intuitively felt that these voices made a lot of sense but
recently found some modern scientific proof for the same. It came from a very
unusual source though. I recently met an old friend who works in open
innovation area and he shared something very interesting.
A large MNC thought that it’ll be good business to be able
to sell products with claims of health benefits derived from wisdom of
traditional medical knowledge. Soon a big budget and high profile team was
allocated for the project. Work began by empanelling doctors and Ayurveda
institutes. Soon the team realized that they need scientific evidence to be
able to make claims. More modern immunologists, doctors and labs were
empanelled. A high profile researcher asked for an expensive piece of
equipment, MALDI-TOF/TOF, and it was quickly sanctioned.
Trials started with some known ayurvedic remedies and soon team
reached conclusions that most ayurvedic physicians know intuitively.
1.
There was no single molecule acting and
triggering a change in the metabolism but there were multiple molecules acting
at different stages of metabolic cycle and bringing about a change.
2.
Chromatography and Spectrophotometry revealed
that the molecules were not the simple ingredients present in the plant but
actually reaction products formed during processing of the herbs, through
processes which are meticulously defined in ayurvedic reference texts.
The team realised that it is too complex a phenomenon to be
explained through simple scientific tools and even more difficult to synthesize
and incorporate these in everyday foods or products.
I wonder how something studied, invented, and documented
centuries ago perhaps without help of any sophisticated equipment is so
difficult for us to even understand today in spite of all the help from
advanced measuring equipment and highly brainy computers. This reminds me of
Buddha, who 25 centuries back discovered the nature, cause, and remedy of all
sufferings just by looking deep inside himself and we with all advanced
understanding of anatomy, physiology, and neural networks are still unable to
comprehend. May be more on this in my next post.
Yes, and the same way as He discovered life of an Atom, which became back bone of His entire teaching...understanding of Anicca.
ReplyDeleteThanks you for your post Extremely educative.
True, the scientists are still not able to synthesize 'phytonutrients' in laboratory.
ReplyDeleteThis means plant are the best laboratories of nature, and can not be replaced by a man-made laboratory !